Theory
Theory
Basics
Explanation
Topicality is an argument that the affirmative plan does not meet certain resolutional requirements. It is a prior question to any argument in the debate because it asks whether the 1ac should have been introduced in the first place. Oftentimes, you establish topicality violations via definitions.
Parts of T
Interpretation (Interp): Explains what your model of debate looks like. Unlike topicality, you do not need cards or define a word in the resolution.
Example: “AFF teams must specify their favorite Cars Movie”
Violation: Explains how the aff does not meet that definition.
Standards: Reasons your interpretation is better for debate. Common standards include:
Voter: Why theory should be a reason to vote neg. Usually framed as fairness or jurisdiction.
When to run Theory
You should run theory when your opponent has truly done something that sets a bad model for debate, irrespective of the topic.
Frivolous Theory
Frivolous (friv) theory is explained in its name—it is pointless. They are often silly arguments (like the Cars interpretation above) that serve as time sucks with silly voters like “fun.” Even though these don’t look threatening, make sure to have enough coverage so it isn’t a viable 2NR option.
Resources
Files
Here are a few files to get you started on theory:
